Click here to follow the Knight Center of Digital Excellence on Twitter.
According to a Pew Research Center Internet & American Life Project study, "The Mobile Difference," nearly 40 percent Americans have positive and improving attitudes about their mobile communication devices, thereby further immersing themselves into a more robust digital lifestyle.
Read more
We'll find answers to as many of
your questions as possible and
publish answers in a future issue.
Ask Us
Multimedia:
How will broadband affect burgeoning controversies over health care? The answers to this question and more came courtesy of a Broadband Cenus-hosted, hour-long panel discussion. View a video of the discussion.
View Now
President Obama on Innovation and Sustainable Growth. President Barack Obama has new plans to strengthen the economy that will all favor people with hi-tech educations.
View Now
Elevate Miami, a comprehensive Digital Inclusion program launched by the city of Miami, aims to serve youth, low-income families, minorities, seniors and residents facing barriers to digital inclusion.
View Now
The Knight Center of Digital Excellence held its first Stimulus Webcast Session for Knight communities and program directors July 23. Watch it online now.
View Now
By pushing hard on broadband, lawmakers hope to close the "digital divide" that has long separated rural America. In doing so, they hope to give rural consumers access to the same sorts of high-speed services and opportunities - think telemedicine, distance-learning and Web-based commerce - that city dwellers have enjoyed for years.
View Now
|
Posts Tagged ‘Broadband Application Training Workshop’
Monday, August 10th, 2009
Our team at the Knight Center of Digital Excellence has been working around the clock to try to bring stimulus dollars to the communities we serve – and that’s only going to intensify as the Aug. 14, 5 p.m. (EDT) deadline for the first round of funding applications is quickly approaching.
Part of the work has been supplying communities with as much information on the process as possible through a number of resources. Below is an aggregated list of those resources (by topic) so those racing to meet the deadline can get what they need as quickly as possible.
Checklists and breakdowns:
• In a mad rush to apply for stimulus funding? Deep breath – and read on (Aug. 7) – As the Aug. 14 stimulus application deadline draws near, here are a few to-do items to include on your checklist.
• Breaking down BIP criteria (July 28)
• Breaking down BTOP criteria (Aug. 1)
• A quick prescription for EHR stimulus (July 21) – Interested in an Electronic Health Record (EHR) system for your community? Then it’s time to take advantage of funding opportunities in the American Reinvestment and Recovery Act (ARRA).
Compliance:
• Compliance to play a key role in stimulus applications (Aug. 7) – A big part of proving your program worthy of stimulus funding is proving it will be compliant with requirements set forth in the ARRA.
Details on important documents:
• A BIP/BTOP FAQ sampling (Aug. 5) – We’ve identified a few of the most commonly asked questions based on our attendance at workshops, and have provided them here, along with our perspective on why these issues are important.
• BIP/BTOP FAQ updated (Aug. 5)
Methodology:
• Solid supporting data can give stimulus applicants an edge (Aug. 3) – There’s an opportunity for communities to strengthen their broadband stimulus funding requests provided their methodology and data are solid.
Stimulus workshop debrief:
Read some key learnings identified by the Knight Center of Digital Excellence at a recent Broadband Application Training workshop.
• Part one (July 23)
• Part two (July 24)
Terminology:
• Stimulus alphabet soup (July 16) – A broadband stimulus funding acronym “cheat sheet.”
• The seven “dirty” stimulus words you need to know (July 16) – A dictionary reference of seven commonly-used broadband stimulus funding terms.
Additional blog topics:
• Planning to seek future stimulus funds? Pay attention now (Aug. 10) – Organizations not participating in the round one scramble for broadband stimulus funds still need to pay attention - both to the application process and how the money is eventually awarded.
Additional Knight Center Resources:
• Knight Center of Digital Excellence website: http://www.knightcenter.org/
• Knight Center of Digital Excellence Stimulus Center: http://www.knightcenter.org/stimuluscenter.html
• Knight Center Stimulus Webcasts: http://beta.knightcenter.org/stimulus-webcasts
• Questions: info@knightcenter.org
Tags: American Recovery & Reinvestment Act 2009, ARRA, bandwidth, Beta, BIP, broadband, Broadband Application Training Workshop, Broadband Initiatives Program, Broadband Stimulus Funding Webcast, Broadband Technology Opportunities Program, BTOP, community, compliance, digital, economy, EHR, Electronic Health Record system, FAQ, FCC, healthcare, infrastructure, innovation, Internet, KCoDE, Knight Center of Digital Excellence, Knight Center of Digital Excellence Stimulus Center, methodology, network, NTIA, OneCommunity, rural communities, RUS, stimulus, stimulus watch, telemedicine Posted in ARRA, Digital news, Knight Center of Digital Excellence, Stimulus Package | No Comments »
Monday, August 10th, 2009
Organizations not participating in the round one scramble for broadband stimulus funds still need to pay attention – both to the application process and how the money is eventually awarded.
As the Knight Center of Digital Excellence learned during attendance at Broadband Application Training workshops, the road to submitting a successful stimulus proposal is not only very lengthy and complicated, but the landscape can continually change.
We’ve seen this with the evolution of the original Broadband Initiatives Program (BIP)/Broadband Technology Opportunities Program (BTOP) FAQ. A second update was required for clarification and posted shortly after the original FAQ – including nine new pages, six new sections and answers to a total of 42 new questions. This was in addition to the original 39 being modified to include more detailed information.
We’ll see fluctuations again during what could prove to be both an interesting and contentious process – application challenges. Funding applications will be posted publicly, and entities can challenge the conclusions, data and findings of other applicants inside of 30 days. Challenges can be refuted as well – also posted along with the challenger’s case and supporting data. For organizations planning to submit future-round proposals, this will be an inside look at what kinds of data other organizations are collecting, how they’re defining certain key terms and, when all’s said and done, how government agencies will define certain key terms.
During workshop presentations, government representatives said round one is a learning process for everyone, including the agencies handing out the money. However, they also indicated firms or entities that have gone down the funding route before and have already identified projects and strategies would have an advantage in obtaining stimulus funding.
It can’t be stated enough: Organizations planning to submit proposals for broadband stimulus funding in rounds two and three shouldn’t neglect what’s happening in round one. They need to pay attention to what’s going on now in order to avoid potential issues down the road.
Remember, many will apply for round one stimulus funding, and many will come back and become stronger competitors in future rounds. Having gone through the process once, they’ll have an advantage the second and third time around.
So pay attention to key federal agencies, the process and which organizations receive awards now. By doing so, you stand to increase your chances for future success.
Tags: American Recovery & Reinvestment Act 2009, application challenges, BIP, broadband, Broadband Application Training Workshop, Broadband Expansion, Broadband Initiatives Program, Broadband Technology Opportunities Program, BTOP, community, digital, FAQ, Internet, KCoDE, Knight Center of Digital Excellence, network, NTIA, RUS, stimulus, stimulus watch Posted in ARRA, Knight Center of Digital Excellence, Opinion, Stimulus Package, broadband | No Comments »
Friday, August 7th, 2009
At Broadband Application Training workshops across the nation, government representatives have stated that compliance monitoring and reporting would play a crucial role in setting a standard of transparency and accountability to funding applicants.
It was made very clear that the government is taking this issue very seriously.
In short, a compliant program will meet the deadlines stated in its application and use money as indicated. During the second review of proposals at the end of September, a separate compliance team will begin checking proposals for compliance issues. Program Officers have already been hired and placed in the field to monitor and provide oversight for specific programs.
What will I need to report?
According to the Office of Management and Budget’s guidance document, recipient reporting required by Section 1512 of the American Recovery and Reinvestment Act (ARRA) will answer these questions:
• Who is receiving funding and in what amounts?
• What projects or activities are being funded?
• What is the completion status of these projects and activities?
• What impact have projects and activities had on job creation and retention?
Prime recipients are required to provide quarterly reports, which will be published publicly. Reports should contain the total amount of funding received, how much has been spent on projects and activities to date, a list of projects including answers to the final two questions stated above and details on sub-awards and other payments.
Broadband Initiatives Program (BIP) and Broadband Technologies Opportunity Program (BTOP) recipients must also report information on a quarterly basis, though required information varies depending on the project type. Consult the stimulus workshop workshop’s compliance presentation for more information on the specific requirements for Infrastructure, Public Computer Center and Sustainable Broadband Adoption reporting.
To make compliance less cumbersome, the federal government is developing an online recipient reporting tool, which is expected to be available for reports due at the beginning of October, at www.FederalReporting.gov. Also, check out the U.S. Department of Commerce’s ARRA Award Terms guide, which provides more general detail about compliance issues.
What will happen if my program is not compliant?
According to BroadbandUSA, the penalties for non-compliance are many. Some of the major penalties include:
• Suspension of payments or the entire award itself
• Termination for cause or convenience
• Debarment and suspension
• Deobligation
Compliance issues are going to play a major role in determining whether projects receive requested funding or not. The federal government is obviously emphasizing the need for transparency and accountability and has made it clear there is a clear commitment to reporting requirements.
When looking at your program, ask yourself these questions: Have I built a sustainable model that will last well after the funding ceased in two or three years? Is it already in place?
What will be covered during an audit?
According to officials, there will be eight major administrative and compliance areas covered in a program audit. They include:
• Financial management systems
• Matching funds/In-kind contributions
• Scope/Budget revisions
• Procurement practices
• Property management
• Subrecipient monitoring
• Financial/Performance reporting practices
• Program income
In addition, a cost audit will be performed and will look at items such as salary distribution, fringe benefits, travel and entertainment costs, contributions and gifts, indirect costs and cost allocation plans, equipment and contracts and sub-awards.
During a presentation on auditing practices, officials presented this example of a cost audit finding: A program manager is working an average of 40 hours a week on a federal grant and 20 hours a week on other projects. The manager’s entire salary is being charged to the grant. The auditor questions one-third of the salary cost. The issues include documentation and valuation.
Keep in mind that non-federal entities (excluding for-profit organizations) are required by the Single Audit Act of 1996 to undergo an annual audit of federal awards. So how do you ensure your organization avoids audit findings?
More than half the battle is won by establishing a solid system of review and documentation. Ensure your proposal is thorough and fact-based, and that you read and understand the award and what will be required before signing. Make sure all staff members understand these requirements as well and that a through review of financial, administrative and project management systems has taken place.
In addition, be sure to document everything. The more thorough your record-keeping, the easier it will be for you to cooperate during the audit and resolution process with full and timely reports.
When in doubt, always ask questions – especially before acting. Make sure you know your agency or department contacts.
The documentation is out there to guide you through the proper steps. Be sure to follow it. If you have questions, play close attention to updates on BroadbandUSA or e-mail us at info@knightcenter.org.
Tags: American Recovery & Reinvestment Act 2009, ARRA, audit, BIP, broadband, Broadband Application Training Workshop, Broadband Expansion, Broadband Initiatives Program, Broadband Technology Opportunities Program, BroadbandUSA, BTOP, compliance, compliance issues, compliance reporting, digital, FederalReporting.gov, Internet, KCoDE, Knight Center of Digital Excellence, network, NTIA, Program Officers, RUS, Section 1512, Single Audit Act of 1996, stimulus, stimulus watch, U.S. Department of Commerce Posted in ARRA, Knight Center of Digital Excellence, Stimulus Package | 1 Comment »
Monday, August 3rd, 2009
There’s an opportunity for communities to strengthen their broadband stimulus funding requests provided their methodology and data are solid.
Look at the following Broadband Initiatives Program (BIP)/Broadband Technology Opportunities Program (BTOP) FAQ item:
Does an applicant have to show that each individual census block within its proposed funded service area is un-served or underserved?
The FAQ says “no,” BUT goes on to state that to qualify for BTOP funding, the proposed service area as a whole must meet the definition of un-served or underserved. To satisfy BIP funding requirements, at least 75 percent of the proposed service area must meet the definition.
If you go through the Notice of Funding Availability (NOFA), you’ll find that almost three full pages (of very tiny type) gives a multi-pronged, thorough definition of each – though the census block data it requests is based on 2000 U.S. Census Bureau data, which is nine years old.
A strong funding request will rely on a foundation of more recent data to define proposed areas - data collected by utilizing validated resource materials that are recognized as being reliable and accurate.
What this says to us at the Knight Center of Digital Excellence is that the NTIA and RUS are open and prepared to accept other methodology and data not based on what they’ve suggested. Therefore, the applicant is going to be able to define the specific area and find support for their claim – if there is good data and a solid methodology to back it up.
Consider a few of the statements made in the FAQ regarding how the NTIA and RUS will look at methodology regarding un-served and underserved areas:
• “Applicants must explain the methodology for determining that the proposed funded service area as a whole meets the eligibility criteria … . The exact methodology is up to the applicant, but the result should be to demonstrate that the proposed funded service area is eligible based on the appropriate definition. Applicants should aim to utilize state broadband mapping data if such data exists. Otherwise, a customer or market survey, statistical sampling, or other valid methodology will be necessary.”
• “If the information submitted by an existing service provider demonstrates that the applicant’s proposed funded service area is not un-served, both RUS and NTIA reserve the right to reclassify the application and consider the proposed area as underserved if the application meets the criteria in the underserved definition. If the information submitted by an existing service provider establishes that the applicant’s proposed funded service area is not underserved, both RUS and NTIA may reject the application.”
Take this into consideration and make sure your data and methodology stacks up.
Considering the NOFA clearly indicates up to 15 points under the Project Purpose section will be scored based on meeting or exceeding submitted population and location figures, the quality of an applicant’s data and methodology could mean the difference in obtaining funding.
As we learned while in attendance at a recent Broadband Application Training Workshop, successful proposals would most likely need to score at least 90 points of the application’s possible 100. A score of 30 or less will result in rejection.
Remember, every point counts. Providing a strong case when defining your proposed service area will help enhance your request.
Tags: American Recovery & Reinvestment Act 2009, BIP, broadband, Broadband Application Training Workshop, Broadband Initiatives Program, Broadband Technology Opportunities Program, BTOP, data, digital, FAQ, infrastructure, Internet, KCoDE, Knight Center of Digital Excellence, methodology, NOFA, Notice of Funding Availability, points, Project Purpose, stimulus, stimulus funding request, stimulus watch, stimulus workshop, U.S. Census Bureau, un-served, underserved, workshop Posted in ARRA, Stimulus Package | 1 Comment »
|
|