Click here to follow the Knight Center of Digital Excellence on Twitter.

According to a Pew Research Center Internet & American Life Project study, "The Mobile Difference," nearly 40 percent Americans have positive and improving attitudes about their mobile communication devices, thereby further immersing themselves into a more robust digital lifestyle. Read more

We'll find answers to as many of your questions as possible and publish answers in a future issue.
Ask Us

Multimedia:



How will broadband affect burgeoning controversies over health care? The answers to this question and more came courtesy of a Broadband Cenus-hosted, hour-long panel discussion. View a video of the discussion. View Now




President Obama on Innovation and Sustainable Growth. President Barack Obama has new plans to strengthen the economy that will all favor people with hi-tech educations.
View Now




Elevate Miami, a comprehensive Digital Inclusion program launched by the city of Miami, aims to serve youth, low-income families, minorities, seniors and residents facing barriers to digital inclusion.
View Now




The Knight Center of Digital Excellence held its first Stimulus Webcast Session for Knight communities and program directors July 23. Watch it online now.
View Now




By pushing hard on broadband, lawmakers hope to close the "digital divide" that has long separated rural America. In doing so, they hope to give rural consumers access to the same sorts of high-speed services and opportunities - think telemedicine, distance-learning and Web-based commerce - that city dwellers have enjoyed for years.
View Now




Posts Tagged ‘stimulus funding request’

Announcement of broadband bid winners to be delayed

Wednesday, October 28th, 2009

Organizations holding their breath in anticipation of hearing whether their first-round broadband stimulus applications were successful might want to take a break – NTIA Administrator Larry Strickling recently said the announcement of broadband bid winners will be delayed by at least “a few more weeks … to get this right.”

Saying he “will not fund a bad application,” Strickling shot down the original agency-imposed award deadline of early November during a Senate Commerce Committee’s Communications Subcommittee oversight hearing on the NTIA/RUS stimulus grant and loan program. RUS administrator Jonathan Adelstein and Mark Goldstein, of the Government Accountability Office, also spoke.

At the Knight Center of Digital Excellence, we feel the delay could be a good move.

A large initial concern was the lack of time states would have to sort through numerous applications, especially given hang-ups in the application process that pushed the due date back. A possible scenario discussed was that states would compensate for the crunch by simply picking their favorite (or most lobbied) programs, or only recommending the state-sponsored applications they knew. There was also the fear that the NTIA and RUS would then take the state recommendations without thorough review since their own volunteer processes weren’t working as smoothly or quickly as originally thought and time was quickly running out on their end as well.

The announcement demonstrates both agencies want their evaluation process to be handled correctly, delayed or not. Again, as Strickling stated, he “will not find a bad application.” To rely on the hurried responses from states, many of which did not have the resources to be as thorough as necessary, may have resulted in funding a number of applications that, in the long run, may not have been the best use of stimulus dollars.

Solid supporting data can give stimulus applicants an edge

Monday, August 3rd, 2009

There’s an opportunity for communities to strengthen their broadband stimulus funding requests provided their methodology and data are solid.

Look at the following Broadband Initiatives Program (BIP)/Broadband Technology Opportunities Program (BTOP) FAQ item:

Does an applicant have to show that each individual census block within its proposed funded service area is un-served or underserved?

The FAQ says “no,” BUT goes on to state that to qualify for BTOP funding, the proposed service area as a whole must meet the definition of un-served or underserved. To satisfy BIP funding requirements, at least 75 percent of the proposed service area must meet the definition.

If you go through the Notice of Funding Availability (NOFA), you’ll find that almost three full pages (of very tiny type) gives a multi-pronged, thorough definition of each – though the census block data it requests is based on 2000 U.S. Census Bureau data, which is nine years old.

A strong funding request will rely on a foundation of more recent data to define proposed areas - data collected by utilizing validated resource materials that are recognized as being reliable and accurate.

What this says to us at the Knight Center of Digital Excellence is that the NTIA and RUS are open and prepared to accept other methodology and data not based on what they’ve suggested. Therefore, the applicant is going to be able to define the specific area and find support for their claim – if there is good data and a solid methodology to back it up.

Consider a few of the statements made in the FAQ regarding how the NTIA and RUS will look at methodology regarding un-served and underserved areas:

• “Applicants must explain the methodology for determining that the proposed funded service area as a whole meets the eligibility criteria … . The exact methodology is up to the applicant, but the result should be to demonstrate that the proposed funded service area is eligible based on the appropriate definition. Applicants should aim to utilize state broadband mapping data if such data exists. Otherwise, a customer or market survey, statistical sampling, or other valid methodology will be necessary.”

• “If the information submitted by an existing service provider demonstrates that the applicant’s proposed funded service area is not un-served, both RUS and NTIA reserve the right to reclassify the application and consider the proposed area as underserved if the application meets the criteria in the underserved definition. If the information submitted by an existing service provider establishes that the applicant’s proposed funded service area is not underserved, both RUS and NTIA may reject the application.”

Take this into consideration and make sure your data and methodology stacks up.

Considering the NOFA clearly indicates up to 15 points under the Project Purpose section will be scored based on meeting or exceeding submitted population and location figures, the quality of an applicant’s data and methodology could mean the difference in obtaining funding.

As we learned while in attendance at a recent Broadband Application Training Workshop, successful proposals would most likely need to score at least 90 points of the application’s possible 100. A score of 30 or less will result in rejection.

Remember, every point counts. Providing a strong case when defining your proposed service area will help enhance your request.